training

Setup Saturday: Get Some Training

need trainingChasing the Gucci unicorn, it can be as addictive as crack and twice as expensive. If you’ve been on Instagram or any gun gurus social media you know exactly what I’m talking about, the latest and greatest that the firearms industry has to offer. Here is the deal, most (not all) of those people get that gear sent to them for free to show to you so you will rush out and buy it, it is marketing at its core. In reality people have budgets, mortgages, kids, and car payments so how do we decipher what is a must have versus what am I buying because it looks good on the gram.

Unfortunately, the answer is as varied as each person. My mentor has a saying when asked about a specific piece of gear, “what’s your mission?” Is your mission to carry a gun to protect yourself? Are you in law enforcement looking to setup your new Sam Brown belt? Each person is operating in their own mission and each person has an operational budget for gear. If you are a CEO your operational budget is much greater than mine but is that new wiz bang 6000 necessary for what you do? Or just a way to flex on the poors?

In the past two weeks we have covered carry gun selection as well as belts and holsters. That will get you out in the world as an armed citizen. Extra credit if you booked a class to learn how to fight with that weapon. But what comes next? I see too many people looking for the NEXT gun or the NEXT mod they can have done. There is nothing wrong with that if it is being done with purpose and not just because you liked how your salesman’s gun looked.

gucci glockI’ve been behind that counter, trust me, most of the time we are crying inside when you start talking about stipple patterns, lightening cuts, triggers, and dots. Learn to shoot what you have now, the way it is right now. I understand that we all want nice things, we work hard to buy things that will last and that will work. In today’s disposable world it can sometimes be hard to come by. I also understand that I will recommend things that are considered “Gucci” just ask my friends. There is, however, a difference between buying a quality flashlight once vs adding a red dot to your gun without having first mastered the irons.

I’ve done a full Gucci Glock from the ground up, rmr, comp, trigger, all of it. Do I still have it? Nope. What do I run now? A stock gen 3 Glock 19. What I found is all that fancy techno wizardry added up to me being just as fast as irons, at traditional gun fight distances. Is there a place and purpose? Absolutely, it just wasn’t for what I do.

Stop idolizing the Instagram warriors, the YouTube gunslingers, and the new new in the industry. There is only one mod you can buy that will make you better, faster, and more accurate and that is training, go get some and I promise, the world of gear will become more clear.

Friday Makeup, Tying Em All Together: Finding a firearms Instructor.

tying em togetherSO, it’s Friday and I haven’t posted anything this week for mindset Monday or Tuesday training tip. Well I apologize for that but I have doing some training myself (more on that later so keep reading). I am going to use today to tie em all together! For mindset Monday it was time to talk about confidence in your mindset, one of the ways you get confidence in your mindset is to have confidence in your training (see it all comes together this week).

Having confidence in your training starts with having confidence in your instructor. When I first started training I got really lucky that I found an instructor in my friend Jay at “Michigan Combat Dynamix” that not only knows how to shoot but knows how to be an instructor. It is because of him and the passion for teaching and building on performance that he has,  that made me want to become an instructor. Like I said, I got lucky. there are a lot of firearms instructors out there. Many are like Jay and are in it because they enjoy teaching, but there are many that are just in it for the money. They are trying to capitalize on the massive influx of new gun owners that are out there right now, and they are the ones that we want to try to avoid. I like to think that I am one of the former type, but I will be the first to admit that I may not be the right instructor for everyone. So how do you tell the difference?

The first thing that most people will look for is reviews of the instructor, and those can be helpful but, should never be taken by themselves. How many times have you gone to a restaurant that had good reviews and not been impressed? Reviews can be old, or fake, take them with a grain of salt. I say call them and get answers for yourself.

Safety is most importantLets talk about what I think the first and most important thing to look at when finding a firearms instructor, safety. When looking at an instructor one of the first things to look for is have there been any accidents in their classes? If you can’t find anything online about anything call and ask them. If they are a good instructor they should be able to say no OR if there has been, they should be able to tell you that why it happened, how any damage or injury was mitigated, and what they have done since to make sure that it doesn’t happen again. Next ask them what their safety S.O.P (Standard Operating Procedure) is. They should be able to tell you about what their process is if there is an accident or injury. They should be able to tell you about any medical training that they have gone through. Finely they should tell you about the medical and first aid gear that they have with them on the range at all times. Things to look for are tourniquets, chest seals, quick clot gauze, or at the very least kerlex rolled gauze, compression bandages and/or coflex dressing, as well as basic first aid things like band-aids etc.

Medical IFAKAfter safety, I think that the next important thing to look at is the type of training they do.  Are they an instructor that says that you going to burn through 1000 rounds of ammo in a one day class? Or on the reverse, are they telling you that you are going to learn how be a SWAT team member with 50 rounds. The fact right now is that ammo is at a premium so most of us (myself included)  are going to have a hard time parting with any of our ammo, and I think that if they tell you need that many rounds for a one day class then there is a good chance that you are going to be throwing rounds downrange with little actual training value. That being said you can only learn so much from non live fire training. As with anything and even more important in shooting, you HAVE to actually shoot your firearm so that you can verify and improve on the non live fire stuff. Ask them about the course of fire for the class, what types of drills they are going to be doing, and how each drill correlates to the type of class that you want to take. A good instructor should be able to tell you how every round you fire will help you improve.

The last thing is completely subjective and probably the least important of them all. If you have called or emailed and talked to them, do they seem like someone that you WANT to learn from? Personality conflicts do happen, and while I am a firm believer that as long as the first two things we covered are in place then there is a very good chance that you can learn SOMETHING from them. Even if it is one small thing that helps you improve and the rest is how not to do something. If you don’t get a good vibe after talking to them, it’s probably better to not take their class. You will be uncomfortable and it will cause you to not enjoy what you are learning. In the end we are training not only to be better protectors, but hopefully because we enjoy the sport of shooting.

countering the mass shooterNow to why this week has been a little different. This week I did some training through USCCA to be able to teach their “Countering The Mass Shoot Threat” course. With everything going on I felt that this was an important course that I was not able to offer and now I can. This class will go over the data on mass shootings from 1998-2016 (those are all the years that we currently have all the data for)  with a focus on what if anything that has/is being proposed would have stopped them as well as how you, your company, or house of worship can develop a plan to mitigate your risk and any damage done if you find yourself in one of these unfortunate situations. Keep an eye out in the training section of this site and like our Facebook page to find out the new class dates. Also if your company or house of worship doesn’t currently have or has not updated their plans, Please get hold of us to see how we can help.

Stance: Training Tip Tuesday

Tuesday is here and it’s time to begin “training tip Tuesday”. This is where we are going to talk about training tips and techniques. We are going to start with the fundamentals of; stance, grip, sight picture, trigger control, and follow through. Today’s post will focus on shooting stance and why it is so important.

What do building a house, baking a layer cake, and shooting all have in common? to be successful they all require a solid foundation. In a house it is brick, cinder block, or cement. The first layer of a cake needs to be the most level or the cake will fall. In shooting it all starts with what touches the ground…for most of us, that’s our feet.

If you ask 100 firearms instructors what the best shooting stance is, you will get several different answers. The truth is that none of them are wrong. It really depends on several different factors but, there are 3 “main” shooting stances.

Weaver StanceThe first is the Weaver stance. this stance was developed in the late 1950’s by competition shooter and L.A. county deputy, Jack Weaver. There are a couple different tales on how this stance developed but, the short versions are that it was either that he was competing in quick draw competitions and wanted a way to draw and use sighted fire as quickly as possible. The other is that there was a match coming up and he had an injury that prevented him from fully extending his support (or non firing) arm. Either way because of his success in matches this became the “standard” shooting platform for civilians, and law enforcement alike. This stance is characterized by the following.

  • The shooters body is bladed (turned sideways) to the target by placing the strong side foot back and turning the support side of the upper body towards the target.
  • The strong or firing arm is extended with the support arm elbow bent

Pros: This allows the shooter to use a very stable “push/pull” grip where the firing arm pushes and the support arm pulls, making it easier to manage recoil. This is a great “marksman” style stance and is very stable.

Cons: The biggest cons to me are that in the L.E. sector this stance can expose part of your body (side) that is unprotected. In the civilian world this stance can be difficult to maintain in a dynamic, defensive situation.


Isosceles StanceThe next stance is the isosceles stance. This stance is the most commonly taught to new shooters. This is because many argue that it mimics the body’s natural reaction posture that will happen in a defensive situation. Like the Weaver stance this stance became popular when in the 1980’s Brian Enos, and Rob Leatham began using it to win IPSC shooting competitions. This stance is formed by.

  • Squaring the shoulders to the target.
  • Feet are shoulder width or even a little more apart. With toes pointing towards the target.
  • Knees are slightly bent.
  • Both arms are extended so that along with the shoulders form a triangle (shocker right)

Pros: The major positives to this stance are that it feels like a very natural stance to most people, because of the fully extended arms it allows for greater recoil management. This has a positive effect on accuracy when delivering multiple shots.

Cons: While this stance is very stable side to side, it is unstable forward to back. This stance also does not allow the shooter to be as agile during movement.

Fighter StanceThis final stance can be called by many names; fighting, boxer, tactical, modified isosceles, etc. I call it a “fighting” stance and it is the one that I use and teach in my Concealed Carry and Home Defense Fundamentals and my Basic Pistol courses because, I believe that it strikes the right balance of natural feeling, stability, and ease of movement. It was developed in the military/special forces and has made its way into civilian defensive shooting. This stance is similar to the isosceles.

  • The shooters shoulders are squared to the target.
  • Feet roughly shoulder width apart
  • The strong (or firing) side foot is slightly back
  • Knees slightly bent
  • Both arms fully extended

Pros: This stance works for any weapon system; handgun, rifle, knife, baton, etc. so you only need to train one stance. This stance provides stability both side to side and front to back. It also makes it easy to move in any direction, allowing you to stay more dynamic.

Cons: There really aren’t any. By modifying the isosceles to be more stable it eliminates the main drawback of the isosceles. If I had to give a con it is that it can sometimes be harder for people with mobility problems to get into properly.

Like I said before, everyone has the stance that they prefer, and they all have pros and cons. find the one that works best for you and the type of training that you are doing.

Scroll to top